I have a nephew 17 years.
I helped him to study at times and I realized that something is wrong.
not in him, he was good in both the bear (poor) and, then, in the votes he got.
There is something wrong with education in general.
I see too many guys who dangle and do not make it.
are all goats? Hopeless idiots? I do not think so.
So where is the problem? Why can not they be interested in anything for more than 15 seconds at a time? There are many who have no interest, many people have nothing to do.
The idea that I have done, of course flattened and trivialized by the word limit and that time I have self-imposed, that is, simply, have become accustomed to short cuts.
I have three elements that, at least for me, were "lights" in my life at the time of high school.
school environment: I had some professors hard enough, but "schematic." Without any type of system, I have always instinctively aware of the conduct of persons applicants. And exploits them to my liking. I knew how to satisfy them, if I wanted (with many professors, I decided to come openly in conflict). In any case, beyond that limit (in any communication book example of bad communication is always the "teacher") were tough and still managed to get me to "compete" with them, and I have learned so much in their . In any case, My mother was left out and the responsibility of dealing with them was mine.
What I see now, however, is too much laxity. The "poor boys" who have to study too much and fail to follow their 1234 activities that their parents want to follow. Mothers and fathers are always ready to justify their own children and children are always ready to justify themselves. Everything costs 10 more minutes of effort ... ZAC, deleted. And here is that the programs are brought up short (no more interesting and updated), university exams are cut and shortened, simplified the votes. There is renewed, it is easier (and simplification is not a good match). And then work hard to excel is not More importantly, because the world is the same school that does not ask more effort.
friendships: among those who study children is stupid. Those who follow the rules, it's stupid. Among the girls, who is good and is not a villain, it's boring. This is definitely not a modern problem, but still leads to flatten out and look for a shortcut, however: whether to be infamous and "irregular" takes you to have a recognition "of the square, however, mechanisms are established in which the benefits are very high. How to make so that it also benefits those who behave properly? It 's true that virtue is its own reward (a phrase that is already among the Greek philosophers, in the Aeneid, then in Spinoza, etc.), but this is a truth that is learned over time, we can not hope that a boy she understands now. It should give a prize for virtue, otherwise you look gratification in other lands.
sport and racing in general: I do not like the super-competitive American model, where children are thrown into the fray a few years to see how they're doing and pull out only those who excel. Sport should be growth and the environment, learn how to fight but to accept defeat. In what little I've seen, always through the eyes of people younger than me, though, I'm seeing only a "fake professionalism." That push all excess sacrificing the fun and smile. Well, this, in my opinion, leads to simplify everything and look for Shortcut, in this case shortcuts to leave. I was really bad at playing football, I started late, at 14 years, and I was not particularly "loose".
I stopped playing at 24 and have taken some satisfaction to me.
But while the former coach challenged me every day, every time, to give more gratifying for me and what little (at first) I could give, the next reproached me anything, any excess, every fantasy, every smile , for "serious players here." Apart from that "game" and "serious" clash between them already, but it is right to limit my behavior (which, however, was respectful the role of the coach, the hours required and the presence - have never arrived late, missing only if forced and disrespectful to the coach or friends) just because I wanted to play and smile and not think to come to a professional team? Again, a short cut: fuck all.
short, a long preamble, I try to get to the point. In high school
Parini of Milan gave birth to very laudable initiative.
Perhaps a coincidence, but started from a philosophy professor. Finally, virtue is not only its own reward, but stance shared and rewarded.
Maybe the boys now have no need of the people who teach shortcuts but will they be proud to seize the fruits of their labor.
I helped him to study at times and I realized that something is wrong.
not in him, he was good in both the bear (poor) and, then, in the votes he got.
There is something wrong with education in general.
I see too many guys who dangle and do not make it.
are all goats? Hopeless idiots? I do not think so.
So where is the problem? Why can not they be interested in anything for more than 15 seconds at a time? There are many who have no interest, many people have nothing to do.
The idea that I have done, of course flattened and trivialized by the word limit and that time I have self-imposed, that is, simply, have become accustomed to short cuts.
I have three elements that, at least for me, were "lights" in my life at the time of high school.
school environment: I had some professors hard enough, but "schematic." Without any type of system, I have always instinctively aware of the conduct of persons applicants. And exploits them to my liking. I knew how to satisfy them, if I wanted (with many professors, I decided to come openly in conflict). In any case, beyond that limit (in any communication book example of bad communication is always the "teacher") were tough and still managed to get me to "compete" with them, and I have learned so much in their . In any case, My mother was left out and the responsibility of dealing with them was mine.
What I see now, however, is too much laxity. The "poor boys" who have to study too much and fail to follow their 1234 activities that their parents want to follow. Mothers and fathers are always ready to justify their own children and children are always ready to justify themselves. Everything costs 10 more minutes of effort ... ZAC, deleted. And here is that the programs are brought up short (no more interesting and updated), university exams are cut and shortened, simplified the votes. There is renewed, it is easier (and simplification is not a good match). And then work hard to excel is not More importantly, because the world is the same school that does not ask more effort.
friendships: among those who study children is stupid. Those who follow the rules, it's stupid. Among the girls, who is good and is not a villain, it's boring. This is definitely not a modern problem, but still leads to flatten out and look for a shortcut, however: whether to be infamous and "irregular" takes you to have a recognition "of the square, however, mechanisms are established in which the benefits are very high. How to make so that it also benefits those who behave properly? It 's true that virtue is its own reward (a phrase that is already among the Greek philosophers, in the Aeneid, then in Spinoza, etc.), but this is a truth that is learned over time, we can not hope that a boy she understands now. It should give a prize for virtue, otherwise you look gratification in other lands.
sport and racing in general: I do not like the super-competitive American model, where children are thrown into the fray a few years to see how they're doing and pull out only those who excel. Sport should be growth and the environment, learn how to fight but to accept defeat. In what little I've seen, always through the eyes of people younger than me, though, I'm seeing only a "fake professionalism." That push all excess sacrificing the fun and smile. Well, this, in my opinion, leads to simplify everything and look for Shortcut, in this case shortcuts to leave. I was really bad at playing football, I started late, at 14 years, and I was not particularly "loose".
I stopped playing at 24 and have taken some satisfaction to me.
But while the former coach challenged me every day, every time, to give more gratifying for me and what little (at first) I could give, the next reproached me anything, any excess, every fantasy, every smile , for "serious players here." Apart from that "game" and "serious" clash between them already, but it is right to limit my behavior (which, however, was respectful the role of the coach, the hours required and the presence - have never arrived late, missing only if forced and disrespectful to the coach or friends) just because I wanted to play and smile and not think to come to a professional team? Again, a short cut: fuck all.
short, a long preamble, I try to get to the point. In high school
Parini of Milan gave birth to very laudable initiative.
Perhaps a coincidence, but started from a philosophy professor. Finally, virtue is not only its own reward, but stance shared and rewarded.
Maybe the boys now have no need of the people who teach shortcuts but will they be proud to seize the fruits of their labor.
0 comments:
Post a Comment