Vtech Electronic Battleship Instructions -command

I do not understand ... The thinking part out of the bird

I do not like politics.
do not like to even talk about it.
I do not feel capable, and I do not like.
What happened these days, though, I scream in my ears.

If someone wants to avoid getting blood bitter, do not continue.

If someone, however, can explain what is happening, its intervention is very welcome.

Maybe I misunderstood something, maybe I did not understand and I could not read between the lines ... if any, of ideas different from mine, speak politely, I'll be very happy if someone thinks

irriferibili and vulgar things, please do not write it here, I hate violence, including verbal, I'm sure that the concepts can be always going to express without being scathing phrases and inappropriate.

facts.
E 'was nominated by a political party just because a person is useful. "
... and this was admitted shamelessly, in front of everyone, without hesitation
candidate just because the newspaper has
and ended the justification of the application (the important thing is winning) with the phrase "and then, let's face it, is nice as Aldo Fabrizi ...


some sympathy is fundamental in politics is essential to have as
newspaper

(overflight and of course on political trends, because what can he do? Mica has much to do politics, should only take a few votes and take, therefore, the money that the policy offers him)

am stunned
first: the justification is given raccapriciante - the utility as a single point of fundamental political choice

second: With one sentence he spat on the whole category of Journalists - if the their publisher goes into politics, all his papers are automatically on our side ... No one has highlighted this syllogism, I hope that in my mind is still fake ... but that, even if true, throw him in the face of all seems a little excessive. if it was thought that newspapers were already on their side, why ask the publisher to enter politics?

third, it sends a distorted message to all those who work in newspapers or on television ... attention, is expected to be on the side of your editor, be very careful what you write these days ... and freedom of thought and criticism? why journalists do not arise? they are muddy, holy god! but do not realize it?

quarter: the man in question drove a football team, years ago ... the results were bad ... why would anyone trust him in the administration of public affairs in the administration of a private thing if he failed?

fifth: it distorts the very concept of meritocracy and politics, with a shamelessness that makes an impression

sixth, at this point I'm cautious because I can not find a document that is of unquestionable truth. But remember, when he was at the helm of the football team, the said lord had trouble with the law ... I find the notes on "Wikipedia", and taken lightly because I can not confirm the truth, speak to several years in prison linked to more than one criminal acts. all charges have been confirmed in Supreme ... and the note ends with "He has never compensated the damages to civil parties constantly changing residence ."...
if it were true, as you put in front of the promise not to present people with conviction by a court?
many greetings to the "Clean Parliament" that you are so stuffed in his mouth these days ...

Moreover, the important thing is just to win, right?

really is becoming all too hard ...


do not understand I can not understand

are tired and even more disgusted
in any civilized country, the release of yesterday would have cost half of a party consents
see what happens with us ...